Saint Irenaeus, Bishop, Doctor, Martyr

2 Kings 25:1-12; Psalm 136(137):1-6; Matthew 8:1-4

Irenaeus was born in Smyrna, in Asia Minor (now Izmir in Turkey) and emigrated to Lyons, in France, where he eventually became the bishop. It is not known for certain whether he was martyred or died a natural death.
  Whenever we take up a Bible we touch Irenaeus’s work, for he played a decisive role in fixing the canon of the New Testament. It is easy for people nowadays to think of Scripture – and the New Testament in particular – as the basis of the Church, but harder to remember that it was the Church itself that had to agree, early on, about what was scriptural and what was not.
  Before Irenaeus, there was vague general agreement on what scripture was, but a system based on this kind of common consent was too weak. As people meditated on the intolerable event of the Redemption, dissensions and heresies inevitably arose, and reference to scripture was the obvious way of trying to settle what the truth really was. But in the absence of an agreed canon of scripture it was all too easy to attack one’s opponent’s arguments by saying that his texts were corrupt or unscriptural; and easy, too, to do a little fine-tuning of texts on one’s own behalf.
  So Irenaeus went through all the books of the New Testament, and all the candidates (such as the magical pseudo-Gospels, and the entertaining and uplifting novel The Shepherd of Hermas). He did not simply accept or reject each book, because his enemies could have said that he was doing it to bolster his own arguments: he gave reasons for and against the canonicity of each. Irenaeus’s canon of scripture is very nearly the modern one (he does not quote from three of the short universal epistles), but more important is the fact that he started the tradition of biblical scholarship.
  Irenaeus had to fight against the Gnostics, who believed that the world was irredeemably wicked, and against the Valentinians, who claimed to be possessors of a secret tradition that had never been written down but passed from master to disciple through the ages. This pessimism and this arcane élitism remain with us even today, and each generation must renew the fight against them. Let us pray for the inspiration of St Irenaeus in our battle.
(UNIVERSALLIS)

St Cyril of Alexandria

2 Kings 24:8-17; Psalm 78(79):1-5,8-9; Matthew 7:21-29

Cyril of Alexandria was the Patriarch of Alexandria from 412 to 444. He was enthroned when the city was at the height of its influence and power within the Roman Empire. Cyril wrote extensively and was a major player in the Christological controversies of the late-4th and 5th centuries. According to Cyril's theology, there were two states for the Son of God: the state that existed prior to the Son (or Word/Logos) becoming enfleshed in the person of Jesus and the state that actually became enfleshed. The Logos Incarnate suffered and died on the Cross, and therefore the Son was able to suffer without suffering. Cyril passionately argued for the continuity of a single subject, God the Word, from the pre-Incarnate state to the Incarnate state. The divine Logos was really present in the flesh and in the world—not merely bestowed upon, semantically affixed to, or morally associated with the man Jesus, as the adoptionists and, he believed, Nestorius had taught.

Todays Gospel is the very end of the Lord's sermon on the Mount. Our Lord ends with a threat and a promise - failing to act on what we proclaim as truth will lead to our downfall - everyone who listens AND acts will be safe - like a man who built their home on rock.

 

Tuesday of Week 12 in Ordinary Time

2 Kings 19:9-11,​14-21,​31-36; Psalm 47(48):2-4,10-11; Matthew 7:6,​12-14

Although the Gospel today is commendably short - a quick glance at the bible reference will reveal that there is a 'chunk' missing! The fragment we do have, is full of meaning. The use of the term 'dogs' for example. In the culture of the day and of the author, a 'dog'. or 'barbarous' was anyone who could not speak Greek - whatever they were saying was of no consequence, as they sounded no better than a pack of dogs barking. However, looking at how Jesus uses the term, it seems he is in a more gentle way talking about those who do not yet understand, who are still seeking. And the 'Golden rule', common in Hellenistic life, was to not do to another what you would not want them to do to you. Fair enough you might think - but Jesus has inverted it - do unto others what you would hope they might do for you...

The missing chunk? That contains another set of rules of life, which are very much worth reading: in every one Jesus spins a common rule of life and gives it a positive twist: Ask, do not take: Be generous, not selfish, recognise the good in yourself, but recognise that God who is so much more than you can be - will give you so much!

7 “Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you. 8 For everyone who asks receives; the one who seeks finds;and to the one who knocks, the door will be opened.

9 “Which of you, if your son asks for bread, will give him a stone? 10 Or if he asks for a fish, will give him a snake? 11 If you, then, though you are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father in heaven give good gifts to those who ask him!

 

The Nativity of John the Baptist

Isaiah 49:1-6; Psalm 138(139):1-3,13-15; Acts 13:22-26; Luke 1:57-66,​80

It is very easy to desire celebrity - the uninhibited adulation by others is attractive! But no matter how much of a celebrity we are, there is always someone who is better than us.

Arguably, the greatest celebrity of all humankind was John the Baptist. He was a prophet from before his birth - he left in the womb as a result of being near to The Lord, his God and ours. He certainly was a celebrity in his time - people travelled from all over the known world to see him. He was a striking figure, a wild man living a life of subsistence yet wise enough and knowledgeable enough to have been able to earn whatever he wanted.

Yet, he placed himself as the least of all men. He could easily have asked his followers to have a way with Jesus, who in human terms was an upstart prophet who threatened to steal John's celebrity from him. But he did not. Instead, he described himself as unfit to untie the sandals of our Lord - the most demeaning task given to the lowest order of slave, as the streets of the town were coated in filth from the animal traffic through them. And he tasked all his followers to follow Jesus.

And Jesus chose him to perform the most personal and significant service to our Lord of any other man - to baptise him.

And now, John is at the very heart of God in the Kingdom of heaven, an example for us all to follow. We must diminish ourselves, that others may find Jesus, not us.

Saint Alban, first martyr of England

Ecclesiasticus 48:1-15; Psalm 96(97):1-7; Matthew 6:7-15

St Alban was the first British martyr. Almost nothing about him is known for certain – even the date of his martyrdom is unknown, and historians’ estimates vary between 209 and 314 A.D. (more recent historical research suggests the mid-3rd century).
  Alban was a Roman who lived in Verulamium and sheltered a fleeing Christian during a persecution. He was converted, and was executed. Whether the persecution was that of the emperor Diocletian or the emperor Decius – whether Alban pretended to be the fleeing Christian, and so died – whether any of the miraculous circumstances of his martyrdom actually happened – all this is, by now, known only to God.
  This does not mean that St Alban did not exist. His cult was already well established by the year 429, and on the hill where tradition said he was martyred, a great abbey grew up which eventually gave its name to the town. Such cults do not appear from nowhere; and the local people conserved in their tradition only what they needed to know – that there had been a martyr there. The fact that legends grew up around him is nothing unusual for the time, and does not cast any doubt on his existence, any more than the legends that gathered round Alexander the Great (who, as “Iskender,” became the hero of many oriental myths that had existed long before his birth) cast any doubt on his existence.
  Scholarship has not dealt so kindly with the supposed companion of St Alban, St Amphibalus, who was at one time commemorated on 25th June. The trouble is that his name (derived from the Greek “amphibalos,” a thing thrown around something) means a cloak, and a cloak figures strongly in the later embroideries of St Alban’s story. St Amphibalus has not, therefore, been in the calendar for many centuries now. Science is not immune from this embarrassing phenomenon. In 1992, a letter to the prestigious science magazine “Nature” revealed the unusual biography of a biochemist named Chir, who had papers credited to him and appeared in all the right citation indexes. There turned out to have been a paper published in the 1960s, by [I am inventing the other names] K.J. Smith, M.Chir, and F. Williamson, Ph.D. Unfortunately, M.Chir is simply the abbreviation of the degree “Master of Surgery,” and so the second author of this paper turns out to be just a degree held by the first author!
  All we know about Alban is all we need to know: that he was faced unexpectedly with a simple, straightforward decision, and he made the right choice. Easy, we think – obvious what to do – lucky man... except that when we envy him his opportunity, we would do well to remember that it was his entire life and character that were summed up in that single split-second decision. His life (of which we otherwise know nothing) made him the sort of man he was. We may imagine that we would do as he did, given the same chance, but given how idiotically most of us behave when taken by surprise, we may well be wrong. When we pray to be given, like St Alban, a simple opportunity to show what we are made of, we should perhaps add a second prayer – that the first prayer should not be answered.

Wednesday of week 11 in Ordinary Time

2 Kings 2:1,​6-14; Psalm 30(31):20,21,24; Matthew 6:1-6,​16-18

Almost  - maybe, sadly, all politics has been tainted at some time or another by corruption, hypocrisy and certainly, the bold and confident presentation of numbers to support their case. Equally sadly, the low turnout in voting at local and general elections suggests that many people are worn out by this. Many very entertaining printed, spoken and televised media use the device of cynicism at the core of their humour.

So how are we to discern who might be the best person to support and vote for in elections? Well, if one ignores the hype, one can see below the 'froth' and discern what the candidates are really like. And our prayers should certainly be said to support the right choice in each and every poll in the country.

Cardinal Vincent Nichols has spoken about our responsibilities in this current general election as practicing Catholics. It is most important that we ensure we are registered and eligible to vote!

 

Tuesday of week 11 in Ordinary Time

1 Kings 21:17-29; Psalm 50(51):3-6,11,16; Matthew 5:43-48

Catholic social teaching promotes global disarmament, working for peace, conflict resolution and upholding universal human rights. Amongst other sources, this arrises in the words of Jesus himself, as exemplified in todays Gospel. We are told we must love our enemies, and we must pray for them.

To take just one current example - very few of us can make any significant difference in the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. We do know that many have died on both sides of the campaign. Pope Francis has hinted strongly that there is a need to end this through negotiation - his words have also been taken out of context to suggest that Ukraine should surrender to prevent the further loss of life. We should not allow ourselves to become part of that unhelpful debate: our role is to pray for an end to the conflict, and if we have the means and opportunity, we should support the victims of it. In Cheltenham there are a number of refugee Ukrainian families, many are Catholic and we should at the very least welcome them to our Parish and provide what we can for their needs. The same is true of other refugees from other conflicts.

But always, we should pray for victims in both sides of conflict.

The Catholic Bishops have given us some guidance on how to take these issues to our prospective MP's.

Monday of week 11 in Ordinary Time

1 Kings 21:1-16; Psalm 5:2-3,5-7; Matthew 5:38-42

The prescription from the Law, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, was not as barbaric as it seems. Read in context (Exodus 21) then one can see that the Law being formulated then, was limiting revenge, rather than defining that revenge must be taken. For many offences in Ex 21, there might be an equal revenge entitlement, but the injured party and the defendant of the charge are given an alternative means of retribution - a fine.

Jesus extends this, and to simply quote that the Bible entitles you to revenge for an injury is to completely ignore the second part of today's Gospel: Jesus tells us not to seek out revenge.

How can we apply this teaching today? Well, our Penal code is designed to encourage a turning about on behalf of the defendant: yes some punishment might be deserved, but the nature of that punishment should encourage the reformation of character. Perhaps there is a good question to ask of your parliamentary candidates before you decide whom to vote for?

A Catholic understanding of criminal justice has three aims: retribution, rehabilitation and redemption.